Yogawellness786

https://youtu.be/MbwxF3LnAoM?si=xkzR4NIpeYixECW_

How intoxicants drop your energy baseline

This video delves into the teachings of Osman, known as the “Blind Muslim Yogi,” who has practiced advanced yoga and meditation for 50 years. Despite being permanently blind since May 2023, he uses vivid visual language in his teachings, a remnant of his decades of normal sight. Osman also has a background as a master-level bioenergy healer specializing in critical care and terminal illnesses, utilizing “telepathic healing capabilities” based on quantum entanglement principles. He claims a 90% success rate in critical care scenarios, attributing it to a scientific process of manipulating and transferring energy, combined with patients following his protocols.

Osman’s philosophy posits that modern lifestyles deplete natural energy, leading to severe ailments like cancer. Reversing these requires rigorous energy restoration. He emphasizes that his therapies are complementary to, not replacements for, licensed medical treatment. Free resources are available on his website (yogawwellness786.com) and YouTube channel, with paid services offered via Patreon.

The discussion then shifts to the yogic model of energy, contrasting it with Western notions of meditation. Osman describes life force energy as ascending through seven chakras from a baseline (Point Z). He introduces a concept of seven descending levels below Point Z, which conventional Western wellness often omits. The goal of yoga, in this model, is to elevate consciousness upwards.

The video explores the impact of intoxicants, particularly alcohol. In the yogic energy model, alcohol acts as a “chemical and energetic dampener,” automatically lowering consciousness by one or two levels from Point Z. While the subjective experience of drinking can be pleasurable due to neurochemical effects, the objective energetic reality is a descent. This descent is evidenced by behaviors like aggression or poor decision-making, followed by regret. Osman notes that about 20% of the population can become addicted to this artificial state, leading to severe life deterioration. This explains why many yoga traditions strictly forbid intoxicants, viewing them as anchors pulling practitioners down.

A surprising revelation is Osman’s personal history: for 19-21 years, he consumed alcohol almost daily, describing himself as a “heavy party animal” capable of drinking multiple bottles of whiskey or 24 pints of beer in a short period. This extreme example is used not to advocate for drinking, but to illustrate that profound spiritual progress is possible even with significant physical chemical tolerance. Osman argues that his intense daily practice (up to 18 hours) created such a powerful “spiritual engine” that it could overcome the “downward drag” of alcohol. However, he stresses this is not applicable to the average practitioner, whose less intense practice would be overwhelmed by such substances.

An alternative perspective from teacher Essay Subramana Swami suggests that moderate daily consumption (1-2 glasses of wine or beer) is acceptable if consumed with meals, as food slows absorption and integrates the alcohol metabolically, framing it as a mild relaxant. Osman’s advice aligns with this, stating that responsible social drinking does not substantially derail progress if daily practice is consistent.

The discussion then moves to inhaled toxins, like cigarettes. While alcohol is a chemical dampener, Osman posits that smoking does not inherently halt spiritual progress from a pure consciousness perspective. However, advanced yogic practices rejuvenate the body, making it hypersensitive. This heightened sensitivity, akin to a child’s, makes the physical body extremely vulnerable to toxins. Smoking, therefore, doesn’t stop spiritual ascent but creates a “fatal vulnerability” to the smoke’s damage. The example of Ramakrishna, the guru of Swami Vivekananda, who died of throat cancer despite immense spiritual mastery, illustrates this paradox: spiritual advancement can lead to physical fragility.

This leads to a philosophical dilemma: is extreme spiritual purity, which increases physical vulnerability, a disadvantage? The video contrasts the “biohacking” mindset of hardening the body against toxins with Osman’s yogic approach of removing armor to achieve extreme sensitivity. This sensitivity allows one to perceive subtle energetic frequencies but also makes one deeply feel the “poison” of toxins. The choice is between being an “armored tank” or a “Formula 1 engine” requiring a pristine environment.

Finally, the concept of “intoxicants” is expanded to include seemingly innocuous foods like onions and garlic. When the body reaches a state of extreme, unarmored cellular sensitivity, these foods can act as potent toxins. Osman describes experiencing a systemic crash, incapacitation, and overwhelming drowsiness after consuming garlic, even overpowering caffeine. This challenges the conventional understanding of health foods and highlights the profound shift in biological perception achieved through advanced yogic practice.

This discussion delves into the profound physiological and energetic effects of various substances on human consciousness, particularly in the context of spiritual practices like meditation and yoga. It begins by explaining the compound allicin in garlic and its mild effects on an ‘armored’ individual, contrasting it with its potent impact on a highly sensitized nervous system developed through practices like meditation. The analogy of a noise-canceling microphone is used to illustrate how a sensitized system, free from ‘static’ (stress, processed foods, etc.), reacts dramatically to even mild stimuli, leading to a profound physiological response like sleep induction.

The conversation then shifts to onions, presenting a more disruptive effect. It highlights the claim that a single slice of raw onion can induce a feeling akin to being heavily intoxicated for 6-8 hours, a sensation attributed to the onion’s energetic footprint interacting with the subtle energy body, not its chemical composition (like ethanol). This effect is said to be noticeable only in individuals who have achieved advanced levels of meditation and cleared their internal ‘static’.

The implications for spiritual practice are severe: these substances, even common foods like garlic and onions, can act as ‘mind-altering substances’ that drug an advanced yogi, drug them into a stupor, and actively counter spiritual progress by lowering one’s energetic frequency. The cumulative effect of regular consumption is described as setting a ‘permanent anchor’ that hinders spiritual advancement.

A critical perspective is introduced, questioning the claims about onions and suggesting psychosomatic responses or food allergies. However, the discussion clarifies that the effects are not about chemical intoxication but about the energetic footprint interacting with a highly sensitized body. The key takeaway is that the human instrument’s ability to perceive these effects changes with practice; what is unnoticed by an ‘armored’ body becomes significant for a sensitized one.

The summary then broadens to include alcohol and smoking. Alcohol is described as a ‘dampener’ that pulls consciousness down, though its effects can be managed with moderation and in conjunction with food. Smoking, paradoxically, while initiating cellular rejuvenation and stripping away ‘armor,’ makes the physical body too sensitive to withstand its own toxicity.

Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes that the core message is not about immediate abstinence but about cultivating awareness. It encourages listeners to observe their unique physiological responses to substances, stripping away cultural narratives and noticing subtle shifts in their baseline. The concept of being the ‘biochemist of your own experience’ is introduced.

Finally, the conversation extends the concept of ‘intoxicants’ to the digital realm. It draws a parallel between the potent effects of natural substances on a sensitized yogi and the impact of ‘digital intoxicants’ like social media doom-scrolling on an ‘unarmored’ mind. The argument is made that algorithms designed to provoke outrage, comparison, and anxiety can pull individuals down energetically, potentially more profoundly than physical substances, and that this is a critical area often overlooked despite meticulous attention to diet.